Entertainment | JioStudios Faces Backlash Over Pulwama Attack Tribute Post
By Newzvia
Quick Summary
JioStudios has drawn significant criticism for allegedly using the anniversary of the Pulwama terror attack to promote their upcoming action-thriller, 'Dhurandhar 2: The Revenge'. The production house's tribute post on social media sparked intense debate regarding its perceived insensitivity on .
JioStudios Faces Backlash Over Pulwama Attack Tribute Post
JioStudios has received significant criticism for an alleged promotional tactic that seemingly used the anniversary of the Pulwama terror attack to market their upcoming action-thriller, 'Dhurandhar 2: The Revenge', on . The production house's tribute post ignited intense debate and backlash across social media platforms for its perceived insensitivity.
What It Is / Release Details
The controversy centres around 'Dhurandhar 2: The Revenge', an upcoming action-thriller from JioStudios. Details regarding its specific release date, director, and full cast were not immediately available at the time of reporting.
Summary / Thematic Hook
The film is described as an action-thriller. The alleged promotional tactic involved a tribute post shared by JioStudios on the official X platform for the 2019 Pulwama martyrs. Social media users were quick to notice that this post, while initially appearing as a solemn tribute, was tagged with personal accounts of the 'Dhurandhar' team members. This led to widespread interpretation that the post was an insensitive attempt to promote the film on a day of national remembrance.
Reception / Box Office
Formal reviews and box office figures for 'Dhurandhar 2: The Revenge' were not available, as the film has not yet been released. However, the immediate reception to the promotional strategy has been largely negative on social media, sparking widespread criticism and prompting the production house to attempt corrections to the original post by deleting tags.
Context / Background
The Pulwama terror attack, a somber event in India's history, occurred on . A convoy of Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) personnel was attacked by a vehicle-borne suicide bomber in the Pulwama district of Jammu and Kashmir, resulting in the deaths of 40 CRPF personnel. The anniversary of this tragic incident is observed with solemnity across the nation as a day of remembrance for the martyrs. JioStudios' decision to post a tribute that was perceived as a promotional tactic for their film on this specific date led to the current social media outrage.
Key Takeaways
- JioStudios is facing significant social media backlash for an alleged promotional tactic on .
- The controversy stems from a tribute post on the anniversary of the Pulwama terror attack.
- The post, which included team tags, was widely perceived as an insensitive attempt to market the film 'Dhurandhar 2: The Revenge'.
- The incident has sparked intense debate regarding appropriate promotional strategies for films on sensitive dates.
People Also Ask
What is the controversy surrounding JioStudios and 'Dhurandhar 2: The Revenge'?
JioStudios is facing criticism for allegedly using the anniversary of the Pulwama terror attack on , to promote their upcoming action-thriller, 'Dhurandhar 2: The Revenge'. A tribute post made by the production house was widely perceived as insensitive by social media users due to the inclusion of promotional tags.
When did the Pulwama attack occur?
The Pulwama terror attack took place on . This devastating incident involved a suicide bomber targeting a convoy of CRPF personnel in Jammu and Kashmir, resulting in the loss of 40 lives.
What is 'Dhurandhar 2: The Revenge'?
'Dhurandhar 2: The Revenge' is an upcoming action-thriller film produced by JioStudios. It has recently garnered significant media attention due to the controversy surrounding its alleged promotional tactics on a sensitive national anniversary.
How has social media reacted to JioStudios' post?
Social media reaction to JioStudios' tribute post has been largely negative, leading to intense debate and significant backlash. Many users expressed outrage and perceived insensitivity regarding the timing and nature of the post, which appeared to blend remembrance with film promotion.